From
Bis Morgen:
Even a surface sweep over
Arnold Schönberg's output shows him to be a romantic at heart, even through the most prickly musical passages. The same can't always be said of
Pierre Boulez. What to make of this character? Is this music relevant? We have an expansion of the
(a)tonal practices of Schönberg, a development of the rhythmic resources of
Stravinsky, but with close links in orchestrations to his
French forefathers. (And let us not forget that the very concept of hyper-organization in music which Boulez so epitimizes was virtually invented by
Franco-flemish composers, his heritage, over 500 years ago!) . What to make of his music? When asked once about the fact that his music did not seem to share his own very charming personality, his wit and humor, he said of the humor in his music, "it's in there."
When asked how long it would take for people to appreciate his music, he suggested that it would take "about 80 years."
Well, Mr. Boulez, it has been